From Spanish to Korean: The Easiest and Most Difficult Languages to Learn (Infographic)

Languages of the world From Spanish to Korean: The Easiest and Most Difficult Languages to Learn (Infographic)

Languages of the World Photo via Shutterstock

Looking to learn a new language? Perhaps you’re torn between a semester in Spain versus a semester in Turkey and you discovered, thanks to this infographic, that Spanish is easier to learn than Turkish. Depending on your personality, you may choose to go with the more challenging experience or opt for a more comfortable, easygoing semester abroad. If you’re an overachiever, scroll down to the last graph and you’ll find the hardest languages to learn — these require approximately 2,200 hours of class time versus the 600 hours for the easier languages (the infographic applies to English speakers).

aprender idiomas 537a738875921 w640 From Spanish to Korean: The Easiest and Most Difficult Languages to Learn (Infographic)

  • don valeri

    Noticed that German is not on any of the language lists. Where is it ranked?

    • Scott

      Probably in the easy section, with the other European languages. German, Spanish, Italian, French, Dutch and English all derive from Latin.

      • Leyla

        German is actually in a special category between easy and medium because it should take 30 weeks or 750 hours to achieve proficiency.

  • Paul

    Having recently completed all the Arabic courses at my previous University I can safely confirm I’m not ready to speak Arabic with anybody other than those who know me and my Arabic level.

  • isponsor

    Spanish is easier to learn than Turkish, yes..

  • Eric

    Actually the above mentioned European languages don’t all come from Latin. The Latin languages are Italian, French and Spanish. The Germanic languages ( which don’t have Latin roots) are German and Dutch. English is a bridge language, a mix of germanic(english) and Latin (french) origins…

  • http://www.newjetsetters.com Deborah Thompson

    Great infographic, Culturist. I spent about 1 year studying Thai before our trip to Thailand a few years back. These were not formal studies but I spent approximately two hours per day studying with books and audio recordings. I also studied the Thai script and learned to read basic Thai script. It was difficult, yes – but my brain felt it was getting a great workout, especially when writing the elaborate figures. I loved it. When we got there I gave it a good try, much to the local Thai people’s delight. We had many good laughs and it was a wonderful way to show and gain respect from the local people.

  • http://www.stgeorges.co.uk Bren Brennan

    Hard languages section needs: Basque and Hungarian

    Polish – medium difficulty? Don’t think so!

    Nice looking graphic though.

  • Noelle

    I actually found Russian and Korean moderately challenging. Chinese and Japanese are very difficult to me because of the sounds vs letters system. I would like to eventually be conversational in Farsi though.

  • Andre

    Great to see Afrikaans there!

  • ece

    I don’t think that all numbers of the speakers are true. In Turkey the population was 76 million in 2013. Turkish is not only spoken in Turkey!! Here it says 50 m. even less than population of Turkey!

  • Gunnar A Birgisson

    try icelandic we have 150 words just for wind

    • Mohammed Waheed

      we have literally 346 different names for “lion” >>> Arabic language

      • Drag Under Näthatargaloscherna

        Wow, icelandic and arabic must be pretty stupid languages then. Not that I believe you, but anyways.

  • Ash

    In Singapore (where I come from), we learn both English and Chinese at the same rate, as first languages, starting from pre-school. I don’t think anyone here takes more than 500 hours of learning to be able to speak/write/read Chinese or English with at least average proficiency. Of course, the main reason for this is that we are surrounded by both of these languages all the time, so most of the learning actually takes place outside of structured classes, in common everyday life through interaction and communication.

  • [fernando batista]

    It’s funny how one of Japanese’s cons is “three writing systems and two sillabaries”. Having Hiragana and Katakana to back up your lack of kanji knowledge is a godsend when learning japanese, and learning both of them takes a few hours or days.

    • Faisal Ali

      As someone who’s learning Japanese, Kanji is useful since there are no spaces in Japanese. Hiragana and Katakana are VERY easy. The only difficult part of Japanese is actually the Kanji. However, if they implemented spaces (as an example) and didn’t use Kanji, Japanese would be by far one of the easiest languages to learn. The sentence structure is SOV (a little over half are) but it’s got quite a logical reasoning behind it. English for some reason decides to have a “rule” but then have a super long list of exceptions which can get annoying even for native speakers.
      More related: knowing the kana is more of a godsend when you have Furigana above unfamiliar Kanji too.

  • Mohamed Aweys

    The easiest language is somali

  • Joseph Otter

    The real question is what would be the hardest language to learn assuming that the learner were a caveman with no prior language skills.

  • Tina

    I do not think Vietnamese is medium and Korean is difficult. it is somehow vice verse